shawn
e7299b17e9
Stack installed: - netfox v1.35.3 (core + extras + noray + internals) - godot-jolt v0.16.0-stable Architecture: - Server: ENet transport (works headless, no netfox deps) - Client/Editor: netfox rollback (RollbackSynchronizer, TickInterpolator) New/modified: - docs/migration-netfox-plan.md — migration architecture - scripts/network/network_manager.gd — netfox-aware ENet fallback - scripts/network/player.gd — clean base player - client/characters/player_netfox.gd — rollback player w/ WeaponManager - client/characters/input/player_net_input.gd — BaseNetInput subclass - client/characters/character/fps_character_controller.gd — netfox input feed - client/weapons/ — weapon data, registry, TacticalWeaponHitscan, WeaponManager - client/scripts/round_replicator.gd — client-side round state bridge - server/scripts/round_manager.gd — improved state machine - server/scripts/plugin_api/plugin_manager.gd — refined plugin system - config: enemy_tag, ally_tag for meatball targeting Removed: old C++ SimulationServer GDExtension (replaced by netfox rollback)
27 lines
972 B
JSON
27 lines
972 B
JSON
{
|
|
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
|
|
|
"$id": "https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/deprecated/distutils/configfile.html",
|
|
"title": "``tool.distutils`` table",
|
|
"$$description": [
|
|
"**EXPERIMENTAL** (NOT OFFICIALLY SUPPORTED): Use ``tool.distutils``",
|
|
"subtables to configure arguments for ``distutils`` commands.",
|
|
"Originally, ``distutils`` allowed developers to configure arguments for",
|
|
"``setup.py`` commands via `distutils configuration files",
|
|
"<https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/deprecated/distutils/configfile.html>`_.",
|
|
"See also `the old Python docs <https://docs.python.org/3.11/install/>_`."
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
"type": "object",
|
|
"properties": {
|
|
"global": {
|
|
"type": "object",
|
|
"description": "Global options applied to all ``distutils`` commands"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"patternProperties": {
|
|
".+": {"type": "object"}
|
|
},
|
|
"$comment": "TODO: Is there a practical way of making this schema more specific?"
|
|
}
|