b0c83af092
Complete replacement of the tactical-shooter project with the netfox-cs-sample (MIT) — a CS 1.6 inspired multiplayer FPS built with Godot 4 and netfox. ## What's new - Full CS-style gameplay: teams (T/CT), rounds, economy, buy menu - 6 weapons: Knife, Glock, USP, AK-47, M4A1, AWP - Bomb plant/defuse with 2 bombsites - Flashbang & smoke grenades - Proper netfox rollback netcode at 64 tick - Network popup UI for host/join - HUD, crosshair, round timer, scoreboard - All netfox singletons registered as autoloads (works in exported builds) ## Architecture - Listen-server (host from client, no dedicated server binary) - Multiplayer-fps game lives at examples/multiplayer-fps/ - Netfox addons registered as autoloads for exported build compat - Godot 4.7 with Forward+ renderer ## Removed - Old headless-server architecture (client_main, server_main, player.gd, etc.) - Custom netfox bootstrap with ENet fallback - Old ChaffGames FPS template (2,420 lines, 844 KB) - SimulationServer GDExtension stub - Godot-jolt physics (netfox sample uses default Godot physics) - Duplicate weapon_data.gd, anti_cheat.gd, round_manager.gd, etc. - Server browser API Python venv (87 MB) - test_range map and modular assets ## Preserved - Git history - Server config at config/default_server_config.cfg - Windows export preset - Build directory (gitignored) Co-authored-by: naxIO <naxIO@users.noreply.github.com>
65 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# Authoritative servers
|
|
|
|
The idea behind multiplayer servers is replicating state. As long each player
|
|
sees approximately the same things happening on their screen, the illusion of a
|
|
shared world works.
|
|
|
|
## Naive replication
|
|
|
|
To implement state replication, we could say that each player is responsible
|
|
for their own state. Players see the effects of their input instantly, as they
|
|
own their state and thus their avatar.
|
|
|
|
The issue is that clients can't be trusted. Your game client is distributed to
|
|
players, who run it in various environments. These environments are out of the
|
|
developer's control, and provide an attack surface for cheats.
|
|
|
|
For example, a modified game client might always report full HP no matter how
|
|
many hits the player takes. If each player is responsible for their own state,
|
|
the cheating player's full-HP state will be replicated to everyone else.
|
|
|
|
## Server as the source of truth
|
|
|
|
What can be controlled is the server, with dedicated hosting. Thus, the server
|
|
can be the single source of truth - or in other words, authoritative. Clients
|
|
send their inputs to the server, and the server responds with the updated game
|
|
state.
|
|
|
|
This makes cheating difficult, as players have limited influence over the game
|
|
world.
|
|
|
|
Game code can also be simplified - everything that affects the gameplay is run
|
|
on the server, while other things such as visual effects are run on the
|
|
clients.
|
|
|
|
The tradeoff is that it takes time for the updated game state to arrive from
|
|
the server. This necessitates techniques that mask this delay, such as
|
|
[Client-side prediction and Server reconciliation].
|
|
|
|
## Other approaches
|
|
|
|
Server-authoritative gameplay with CSP is not a silver bullet unfortunately,
|
|
and different games may require different approaches to network state
|
|
replication.
|
|
|
|
One good example is RTS games. These games can have 50+ or even hundreds of
|
|
units navigating the map and interacting. Broadcasting all of their state to
|
|
all of the players from the server may not always be feasible.
|
|
|
|
Instead, players broadcast their actions ( inputs ) to each other and update
|
|
their game state in lockstep. While this approach can scale up to hundreds of
|
|
units, it has other drawbacks. One of these is developing the game in such a
|
|
way that the simulation is exactly the same across multiple CPU architectures
|
|
down to each bit.
|
|
|
|
For more on this approach, see: [1500 Archers on a 28.8: Network Programming in
|
|
Age of Empires and Beyond]
|
|
|
|
For more approaches, see: [Networking for Physics Programmers]
|
|
|
|
[1500 Archers on a 28.8: Network Programming in Age of Empires and Beyond]: https://www.gamedeveloper.com/programming/1500-archers-on-a-28-8-network-programming-in-age-of-empires-and-beyond
|
|
|
|
[Networking for Physics Programmers]: https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1022195/Physics-for-Game-Programmers-Networking
|
|
|
|
[Client-side prediction and Server reconciliation]: https://www.gabrielgambetta.com/client-side-prediction-server-reconciliation.html
|